I'll give my personal opinon:

I assume that God gave us intellect so that we may come to know him of our own Free Will.

What do you find "Anti-Religious" abut the concept of Free Will.
It is very much a part of my religion.

The ability to disagree with God, (if we assume God to be the truth, this means disagreeing = being in error) is a side-effect of having Free Will.
If you have the ability to freely choose what is true or what is right, you must by necessity have the ability to choose what is false or wrong.

Having the ability to do something and God desiring us to do something, are two different things. Rather, by giving us Free Will he desires that we choose to do what is right. But by the very fact that we are able to choose to do good, we must logically also have the correspondingly opposite choice - to do what is wrong.

Why assume that God wants you to do something which he will condemn you for? He has given you a tool (Free Will) that he wants you to use to an end (to do what is right). In the same way I may give you a hammer (a tool) and and tell you to hammer a nail in the wall for me to hang a picture up on (a desired end). You could however use the tool for something I didn't intent for you to do. You could use it to bash your broters head in with. Yes, I gave you the tool with whch to do it. But that is not what I wanted you to use it for.

The ability to choose evil is a necessary side-effect of having the ability to choose what is good.

You have asked another question here as well, however.
I have stated why I believe we have the ability to choose to do wrong (a side-effect of being able to choose to do right), but you also mentioned God condemning us. Well, if he is a good God then he must also be a just God, for who would seriously consider justice to be an evil quality?
Surely every sane person consider justice to be a quality belonging to goodness? Thus a good God is also a just God, and it is just to condemn what is wrong.

Such as?

I think what you are asking here is why God gave us Free Will anyway?
I believe that the reason is because he wanted his creation to freely choose to do right. I suppose he could have made us without the ability to make our own decisions. In that case, he would have made robots. We would be mindless automatons. If we do good because we have no choice in the matter, what credit would that be to us?

If I tell you my child that it is good to share his toys with his friends and this is what I want him to do, whch will please me more? Which will give more credit, more kudos? If he does so whilst I give him the free choice to do so or not? Or if I force him to do so? It would obviously be the latter, would it not? Similarly, if you donate to charity through your own choice, then it does you credit, yes? But if I order you to give your money at gunpoint then you haven't really done a good deed, have you? You simply had no other real option.

So goodness, which God desires, is a result of the right choice + freely doing so. If you remove the choice, then it is not good but merely an act of necessity. Since I assume God desires goodness, then Free Will is needed.

To do the right things with no choice in the matter is not a good act on your part, merely a neccesary act.

Also, to have the choice but choose to do wrong is an act of evil.
We are using our ability for an end it was not intended for. This is the very definition of the word "perversion". To use something for a wrong/unintentional end. Thus a perverse act is an evil act.

A simple question ,why did god make us imperfect and then expect perfection?

First, you have to explain what you mean by perfect?
God is perfect, anything less than God must therefore fall short of perfection.
To ask why we were made imperfect is to ask why God did not create God.

The second part of the question is "why did God expect perfection from us?"
Why do you think he does? I do not believe God expects us to be perfect, for this would be to expect us to be God. What God desires (expect is wrong because he clearly understands our limitations) is that we choose to do what is right and so come to the fulfilment of our purpose.

So we are not perfect, is there a reason why god cant make us perfect, is he incapable? So you agree we are not perfect, how imperfect are we? are we all equally imperfect? or is there subtle differences? I think he does require a certain perfection otherwise what is the purpose of our testing? What is the purpose of our imperfection? to test how imperfect we actually are, are we a type of prototype?

That's a very good question.
For starters, I don't think he wanted to make us perfect because as I said, perfection would be God. I don't think he wanted to create a clone of himself. What would be the point?

But the really juicy one here is asking whether God would be capable of it?
God is eternal, he always has been. He is the Uncaused Cause. He didn't even cause himself. It is a nonsensical notion anyway, as cause suggests something preceeding the act, and as God is eternal then nothing preceeded him, therefore he can't have a cause.
But could he cause another one of himself? I'm tempted to say no, but then this would immediately have implications on his omnipotence. For if something is beyond God's ability, then he cannot be omnipotent.

Perhaps this is just something beyond our ability to grasp?
I'm reluctant to say that because it sounds like a cop-out, but it is actually a perfectly valid statement. There is no reason to suppose that finite creatues are able to comprehend the entirety of the infinite.


Absolutely.

How do you quantify perfection/inperfection in this case?

Again, this depends on what you mean.
There is a Papal Enyclical which discusses the modern notion of the "Equality of Man". The problem, it says, with the modern notion of equality between people is that it confuses "equality" with being "identical".

I think I am the equal of my next door neighbour.
He is not equally as knowledgable as me about history or philosophy.
Neither am I as good as him at fixing cars.
We are certainly not identical, and we are not all as equally capable of doing the same things. This is why modern notions of equality fail, they are not rooted in reality.
However, I do believe we are still equal as human beings. By that I mean, we are all born with an immortal soul, and we are all called to the same high dignity as children of God.

If we share this same nobility of spirit, then our imperfections must be similar. We do not have immanent knowledge (which belongs to the eternal), we have a disposition towards evil, we can defect from truth/goodness, etc.

I used to think of life as a test or trial, but I'm not so sure anymore.
I don't think we were specifically created to be tested.
Speaking from a Christian perspective, I believe we were originally created for an earthly paradise, to know God and be known by him in that setting. The idea of a Fall radically changes this. We became mortal, and with a knowledge of Good and Evil, we also became able to commit evil.
For if you don't understand the difference, you can not do evil.
For evil, I believe you must have the intention, and the intention requires knowledge. If a crane drops something on someone and kills them, has the crane committed an evil act? That is surely an absurd idea, for a crane is an inanimate object. It simply did what it did. It had no notion of doing something wrong or evil. Nor do we prosecute children below a certain age for doing something deemed otherwise criminal, for they do not possess the reason or knowledge to understand what they did was wrong.
So in order to do evil, we must know we are doing evil (this runs contrary to my Platonism, btw). Anything else is merely accidental or tragic without culpability.

So our purpose changed after the Fall.
We were now able to commit acts in the knowledge that they were right or wrong. We could act with evily intent. Of course, justice is a virtue and a good God must possess such virtues. Thus a good God is a just God. And justice requires that evil be punished. So now we have been opened up to the possibility of damnation. However, to offset this, God made available to us a higher destiny which was not at first set out for us. That we may transcend this world and be received into the Beatific Vision, that is to say into the full presence of God in the eternal realm where he abides (Heaven). So I dont believe we were created with the purpose of being on trial. Rather I see this as a development after the Fall. and of course, it belongs to the nature of justice that evil be punished and good rewarded.

BTW, this new destiny opens up another area of theology which is touched on by Aquinas and some others, and which involves a very interesting specualtion about a kind of temporal paradox which wouldn't be out of place in a sci-fi/fantasy story. But let's leave that for another time

So by your reasoning you actually dont know if god made us imperfect or not but he imposed a certain judgement upon as if we were. Now judgement involves eternal damnation and an eternity in hell, just for not being perfect. He creates a species that he could possible work out he is not capable of making perfect but insists it attempts perfection and if it fails then its in the fire box. I take it you just fear this nutter and not exactly like him?

In my understanding of the tradition, he only expected perfection in Eden, and free will on this matter came down to forbidding Adam and Eve from eating the fruit.

Since the exile from the garden perfection is no longer expected -- it is rewarded.

__________________
Forum Links: Rules | User Control Panel |Video Tutorials |Blogs | Social Groups | FAQs

"How you get so big eating food of this kind?" -Yoda

Well there are entire books written about these things but in simplistic form:
God is rational agent. As Einstein would agree.
The world is in a sense: emmanation of spirit; a manifestation of the divine.
God takes in and retains the experience of the world.

The best (although inadequate) analogy for the relationship between god and the world is that between your mind and your body.
Is your heart part of you? Is it you? "You" transcend your material composition. The divine "transcends" the material world while being completely "immanent" within. The self organizing properties of nature, the tendency towards order, life, mind, experience is spirit working throught matter with the goal of creation of value.

The divine is the source of being, of potential, of experience. The world is potentiality becoming actuality.

__________________
The truth is easily vanquished but a well told lie is immortal (Mark Twain)

Reward is by being perfect, as imperfect beings perfection is impossible. We go to heaven or hell the reward or punishment.

---------- Post added 11-08-2009 at 04:04 PM ----------

I have scrutinised your post and I think your saying he is a conscious god capable of realising his creation. Could you confirm this , please?

Adam and Eve were not condemned to hell according to the Bible -- it says nothing about their afterlife. Yet they are the only example to my knowledge in the entire Canon of God himself imposing a specific punishment for a specific act.

__________________
Forum Links: Rules | User Control Panel |Video Tutorials |Blogs | Social Groups | FAQs

"How you get so big eating food of this kind?" -Yoda