Nassim Haramein. Debunked?

[dwixi]

I seen a video on this guy and liked it. But the comments buy the guy "god" in this forum argue that he's just a c Carleton.

To find this debunked discusstion google "Nassim Haramein Debunked"

What do you guys think?

[William]

We don't have a member called "God" on this forum. At least he is not on the members list.

William

[dwixi]

Originally Posted by William

We don't have a member called "God" on this forum. At least he is not on the members list.

William

I was talking about the member in the link that i posted.

[xris]

I dont know enough about the guy to make a reasoned response but i do feel ive been here before.We do have these strange legends and nature is full of paterns of life but putting them altogether to make story of everything sounds a step to far.Ide like to see what his contemporaries say about his theories first.

---------- Post added at 07:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:31 AM ----------

Originally Posted by William

We don't have a member called "God" on this forum. At least he is not on the members list.

William

Its spelt with J...bill.

[William]

What do you think personally? I am not a physics student at all but Nassim made a lot of sense to me. Being an absolute first grader when it comes to understanding physics, I watched the "approaching the event horison" prelude to his seminar and was rather amazed at the simplicity of his language and it made an enormous amount of sense; even to me, especially about the "invisible dot" in which he starts to talk about. I have never understood how something can appear out of nothing. No matter how small you go, that dot is going to be made up of other "dots". I would be interested in hearing what you think if you can possibly keep in on a first grade level, Ha.

William

[dwixi]

Originally Posted by William

What do you think personally? I am not a physics student at all but Nassim made a lot of sense to me. Being an absolute first grader when it comes to understanding physics, I watched the "approaching the event horison" prelude to his seminar and was rather amazed at the simplicity of his language and it made an enormous amount of sense; even to me, especially about the "invisible dot" in which he starts to talk about. I have never understood how something can appear out of nothing. No matter how small you go, that dot is going to be made up of other "dots". I would be interested in hearing what you think if you can possibly keep in on a first grade level, Ha.

William

He does the same things as lots of people trying to convince you they are right and make you feel stupid if you don't believe him.

He claims he came up with these ideas as a child. To make you think "wow I must be really stupid if i don't agree with him" also he gets the audience to laugh at other peoples theorys. It seems like he is just being an entertainer and convince people. He doesnt act like someone that is into genuine scientific research but trying to sell people his idea.

[Justin]

I'll provide some links to his stuff for review. There's always going to be opposition no matter what.

Grand Unified Field Theory, part 1

Grand Unified Field Theory, part 2

Grand Unified Field Theory, part 3

Here is his main videos:

Crossing the Event Horizon: Another Cycle Begins - p. 1 of 3

Crossing the Event Horizon: Another Cycle Begins - p. 2 of 3

Crossing the Event Horizon: Another Cycle Begins - p. 3 of 3

Take a look for yourself and make your own decisions on the validity. To each their own.

[dwixi]

Thanks for putting them up.

I find it hard to make judgements as I don't know anything about the things he is making claims about. Seriously that swirling vortex thing on Jupiter might not even exist and I wouldnt know

The only thing I can really make comments on is his style of explaining things. Making people laugh at old theories on one of his videos and it looking very show him sitting on a beach doing his talk? There the only things that make me wonder that I can make any kind of judgement about him on.

[Justin]

Originally Posted by dwixi

Thanks for putting them up.

I find it hard to make judgements as I don't know anything about the things he is making claims about. Seriously that swirling vortex thing on Jupiter might not even exist and I wouldnt know

The only thing I can really make comments on is his style of explaining things. Making people laugh at old theories on one of his videos and it looking very show him sitting on a beach doing his talk? There the only things that make me wonder that I can make any kind of judgement about him on.

The only way to understand Haramein is to understand Walter Russell and the science of Russell. I was at a talk of his where he tied Russell into his own findings in science. He's actually a really nice guy with a neat personality. I commend his desire to seek out these answers and work through them like he does.

If we can understand energy and the energy of the universe and the sexed opposites and balance, it will be easier to understand what he's talking about. It's deep either way.

Nicola Tesla told Russell to bury his scientific knowledge because the world would not understand. What's interesting, is that science is just now coming to terms that Russell was correct.

If you'd like to understand more about Walter Russell, take a look at University of Science and Philosophy - P.O. Box 520, Waynesboro, VA 22980 - Home

[dwixi]

Originally Posted by Justin

The only way to understand Haramein is to understand Walter Russell and the science of Russell. I was at a talk of his where he tied Russell into his own findings in science. He's actually a really nice guy with a neat personality. I commend his desire to seek out these answers and work through them like he does.

If we can understand energy and the energy of the universe and the sexed opposites and balance, it will be easier to understand what he's talking about. It's deep either way.

Nicola Tesla told Russell to bury his scientific knowledge because the world would not understand. What's interesting, is that science is just now coming to terms that Russell was correct.

If you'd like to understand more about Walter Russell, take a look at University of Science and Philosophy - P.O. Box 520, Waynesboro, VA 22980 - Home

What did you think about that "debunked" discussion?