| ||||||||||||
| |||||||
| MetaPhilosophy Thread, Philosophy and Society in Philosophy Forums; I've pondered this question for a while, but I don't know enough history to adequetly answer it myself: "Does academic ... |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Philosophy and Society I've pondered this question for a while, but I don't know enough history to adequetly answer it myself: "Does academic philosophy reflect soceity, or does society reflect academic philosophy?"
__________________ de omnibus dubitandum est |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Philosophy and Society Good question. There's no question that academic philosophy has some influence on society, like law, applied ethics, etc. But if you're talking about the ordinary lay person, I believe that academic philosophy has very little influence on their thinking. The philosophers of the enlightenment probably had the most influence on society. It's very hard to say which reflects the other. Maybe it's a chicken or the egg kind of thing. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Philosophy and Society From what I understand during various socio-history and anthro-history classes. Academia reflects the edges of a society, the fringe, those people not represented in the middle or the 'average joe'. However being on the intellectual fringe and endowed with an abundance of social prestige giving them a disproportionate sway on public opinion, it often means that academia is the vanguard. Society often eventually goes where academia has already been. Sort of like an overblown intergenerational Kuhnian paradigm shift. Not being a historian I can only attest to the same sort of model being implemented in endangered languages, yet at this point I have no real reason to discount what my professors said so many years ago.
__________________ Pink is not exactly the color of non-conformity...... |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Philosophy and Society Philosophy does not exist in a vacuum somewhere in the groves of academe. Consider, for example, its interaction with science, especially since Bacon, or consider its influence on the American Revolution. Generally, though, it seems that the influence is less than direct and immediate, but filtered or mediated before it becomes an effective motive of action (consider the Industrial Revolution from about 1830 to 1930). In this process, it somewhat resembles the mediation of technology to the discoveries of pure science. The Summa to Roman Catholicism The Second Sex to the Women's Movement Das Capital to Communism All of these significant texts can be seen as an reflection of the concerns of society, of the circumstances in which they were written, and---at the same time---they helped shape subsequently the views of society, but different ways. My point is that the relationship between Philosophy and Society is extremely complicated, and not always am obvious and direct causal one, just as language both shapes and reflects the society at any one time. A very interesting question, though. Very interesting. Regards, John
__________________ Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. Forum Links: Rules | User Control Panel | Video Tutorials | Blogs | Social Groups | FAQs |
| The following users say: THANK YOU - jgweed for the above post! | ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Technology and Society | Theaetetus | Social Philosophy | 4 | 11-24-2008 05:24 PM |
| The Future of Philosophy in Society | Faun147 | Social Philosophy | 49 | 10-31-2008 08:22 AM |
| The Socratic SOCIETY | <daleader> | General Discussion | 5 | 02-28-2008 01:50 AM |
| the Origin of Society | Nate's Mind | Philosophy of Politics | 8 | 10-10-2006 05:06 PM |