| ||||||||||||
| |||||||
| Epistemology Thread, Dangerous knowledge? in Branches of Philosophy; Is any knowledge dangerous? Not rather the hands that are lifted because of it? Does the knowledge dictate us or ... |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Dangerous knowledge? Is any knowledge dangerous? Not rather the hands that are lifted because of it? Does the knowledge dictate us or do we dictate the knowledge? Are we a knowledge unto ourselves? Can knowledge ever even be created? Is the only consequence of knowledge safety or danger? Again is knowledge anything more than that which it is put towards? Is any knowledge dangerous? Big questions each in of their own right, one leads to the next, answer one or many, if you will. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Dangerous knowledge? im thinking knowledge can be likely to result in dangerous circumstances due to the ways such knowledge is likely to inspire a human mind. in other words, it's kind of a semantics thing. is something dangerous because of its potential for damage (like a gun for instance?), or is a gun only dangerous to someone who chooses to use it in the wrong way? i personally go for option 2 because i believe that people are generally free to make their own choices, its kind of this thing i believe...
__________________ Most truths are so naked that people feel sorry for them and try to cover them up... |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Re: Dangerous knowledge? Ignorance in the guise of knowledge is not just dangerous, but deadly... |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Re: Dangerous knowledge? No. Not inherently on its own. Hands can indeed help (assist) in spreading knowledge. They can also pass knowledge along without any assistance from verbal or written language. Quote:
If DNA is a Code, and all Codes have Authors, then yes, we can be, "a knowledge unto ourselves". But that knowledge may not be from ourselves. It may be from another. Show me one that wasn't. No. Some would say Enlightenment. Quote:
Again, it can be. You are drunk. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Dangerous knowledge? It all depends on what you mean by "knowledge." If by knowledge, for example, one means only matters of fact, then it is hard to conceive that this kind of knowledge would be "dangerous" (to whom, one might ask).
__________________ Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. Forum Links: Rules | User Control Panel | Video Tutorials | Blogs | Social Groups | FAQs |
| The following users say: THANK YOU - jgweed for the above post! | ||
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Dangerous knowledge? I drink therefore i am. But only fridays, special occasions and deep depressions. (so i am only therefore at those times?) ---------- Post added 01-23-2010 at 12:39 AM ---------- Quote:
Not what i mean knowledge to mean, what does it mean to you given for me to know what you mean, not always as you mean but what you m ean is enough. So give it. Knowledge means more than the fact of the matter, for not all and the important knowledges aren't made from matter even if because of them. Some things are and are not facts, some things are and are not matter, some things are and are not physical, but some things are knowledge with out any of the previous. So please decribe for me what knowledge is one more time for the hard of hearing such as i am. ![]() ---------- Post added 01-23-2010 at 12:41 AM ---------- Quote:
Can you exist without knowledge, even if it is the knowing how not to. Can you be ignorant from choice? Choice being a knowledge. Last edited by sometime sun; 01-22-2010 at 08:45 PM. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Re: Dangerous knowledge? Ignorance is not knowledge, but moral ignorance seeks only so much knowledge as can give it power...It is not the thing in itself they desire, but its secondary effect....Think; Knowledge is good...Why??? It is because if we have moral knowledge, we know how to use all other knowledge for Good...Power is neither good nor bad, but is active, and mindless, and so, dangerous and deadly...If knowledge is good, it is because moral knowledge limits far more than in allows... |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Re: Dangerous knowledge? All knowledge may be intrinsically good (good independently of its effects); but some may be extrinsically bad (bad because of its effects). So, the question of whether knowledge is good or bad (dangerous or innocuous) is ambiguous, and it depends on whether you mean intrinsically dangerous, or extrinsically dangerous. And the answers are respectively, no, and yes (some). |
| The following users say: THANK YOU - kennethamy for the above post! | ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dangerous power | awoelt | Young Philosophers Forum | 1 | 11-26-2009 03:33 AM |
| Fear of Knowledge | Theaetetus | Book Reviews | 4 | 11-21-2009 03:00 AM |
| Which is more dangerous? | Poseidon | General Discussion | 30 | 03-23-2009 09:44 AM |
| Can Knowledge Save Us. | William | Social Philosophy | 28 | 10-10-2008 08:06 PM |
| Dangerous Knowledge - BBC Philosophy | Justin | Videos Discussion | 0 | 09-05-2008 07:32 PM |