Philosophy Forum  
Register Blogs Videos FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Philosophy Forum > Philosophy Forums > Branches of Philosophy > Uncategorized

Important Notice

Uncategorized Philosophy branches often overlap making it difficult sometimes to fit it into the proper category. If this is the case, post in this forum.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008, 05:56 PM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Antarctica
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
MySiddhi is on a distinguished road
Re: The Cognative Theoretic Model of the Universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zetetic11235 View Post
You are indeed Mars Sterling Turner correct?
Science Forums - View Profile: MySiddhi

Latest posts of: MySiddhi - Naked Scientists Discussion Forum

Proof of God - Raving Atheists Forum

mars sterling turner - Google Search

Because I cannot find anything by him or of him divorced from your screen name/webpage.
I am Mars Sterling Turner... here is my website;

http://mysiddhi.freehostia.com/
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008, 07:15 PM
Zetetic11235's Avatar
Full Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: united states, kentucky
Posts: 421
Thanks: 21
Thanked 116 Times in 87 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 2
Zetetic11235 will become famous soon enoughZetetic11235 will become famous soon enough
Re: The Cognative Theoretic Model of the Universe

Do you have any standing patents or pending patents for your work? Also, do you think it possible that you could simply join the mega society? Looking at the titan test, it doesn't seem an insurmountable obstacle for someone of high intelligence who is willing to put in the time to take it. If you could get a high enough score on the test you would have quite a bit of interaction with langan.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008, 07:54 PM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Antarctica
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
MySiddhi is on a distinguished road
Re: The Cognative Theoretic Model of the Universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zetetic11235 View Post
Do you have any standing patents or pending patents for your work? Also, do you think it possible that you could simply join the mega society? Looking at the titan test, it doesn't seem an insurmountable obstacle for someone of high intelligence who is willing to put in the time to take it. If you could get a high enough score on the test you would have quite a bit of interaction with langan.
Here is one of my inventions I have an application on;

Toric pulsating continuous combustion rotary engine compressor or pump - IP.com's Patent Debate

I suppose I could get tested. I am almost running out of discussions that are half way intelligent on all the different forums I am on. I guess if I end up getting bored with the open forums I will just have to get tested so I can join Ultranet.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008, 08:15 PM
Zetetic11235's Avatar
Full Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: united states, kentucky
Posts: 421
Thanks: 21
Thanked 116 Times in 87 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 2
Zetetic11235 will become famous soon enoughZetetic11235 will become famous soon enough
Re: The Cognative Theoretic Model of the Universe

It is going to be quite difficult to find a community that has both sufficient interest in your ideas and sufficient knowledge of physical science to follow. Your theoretical work is simply not accessible by those who do not have a knowledge of theoretical physics and mathematics.

I am a 19 year old college sophmore getting his degree in both mathematics and physics, however I simply do not yet have the technical facility to comment on the theoretical physics that you cite. Most of the people on this forum do not have phd's in theoretical physics nor do they self study the subject. I am afraid you will be limited to non-technical disscussion here unless the technical aspect is of purely philosophical interest; introduction of terms and concepts of hard science will simply alienate nearly every person on this forum from the discussion.

You may even find the same problem on ultranet, as the specialties of the mebers may widely vary.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2008, 06:31 PM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Antarctica
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
MySiddhi is on a distinguished road
Re: The Cognative Theoretic Model of the Universe

I found a research paper you might find interesting about scalar energy;

http://www.scientificexploration.org.../15.2_meyl.pdf


I found the link in an older version of my proof;

MySpace.com Blogs - Humble God MySpace Blog
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2008, 07:57 PM
Fairbanks's Avatar
Full Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 174
Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
Fairbanks is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb Re: The Cognative Theoretic Model of the Universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zetetic11235 View Post
this paper caught my eye a while back while browsing Physicsforums.com. The piece is a supposed theory of everything and reads more like a philosophy text than a science text, so I thought it might be more appropriate to discuss on a forum such as this.
Thanks for pointing out this paper. I will take a skeptical approach in the sense that investigation is required.

-
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2008, 05:04 PM
Fairbanks's Avatar
Full Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 174
Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
Fairbanks is on a distinguished road
Re: The Cognative Theoretic Model of the Universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by MySiddhi View Post
. . . And you will never likely see technology based on it in public view because it would inherently go against vested monopoly interests.

The Tom Bearden Website

I have Tesla's books, Keely's books, and Russell's books. Langan's stuff, too. Anything else I need besides a hotline to Hoagland?
__________________
Knowledge without integrity is dangerous and dreadful --Samuel Johnson
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Om in the Universe? Brian Philosophy of Science 6 10-23-2008 09:28 PM
A new conceptual model of the universe. diamantis Metaphysics 11 08-14-2008 07:40 PM
Role Model Quotes andykelly Memorable Quotes 1 07-28-2008 12:14 PM
An attempt to construct the functional model of mind Nate's Mind Philosophy of Mind 10 01-28-2007 03:57 AM



vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright 2006-2008 PhilosophyForum.com