100+ Free Videos About Nuclear Power

[rado]

Originally Posted by Pythagorean

And aren't nuclear power generated electricity plants cleaner and therefore better for the atmosphere than coal burning plants?

At least until the nuclear plant blows up. And the more there are, the greater the risk for it to happen.

Also read Russells "Atomic suicide?" He has som very good arguments against using nuclear power, some of which are unknown to science today. He actually predicted that the ozone layer would disappear and also when, 20 years before it happened, and this prediction was based on the fact that radiation destroys oxygen. There is a thread about it here:

http://www.philosophyforum.com/forum...r-russell.html

Rado

[Pythagorean]

Hi, rado. I just want to say that I do have respect for Walter Russell. I understand he made some scientific predictions that actually came true and for that no one can take away the respect that is due to him. Also I appreciate what I see as his overall human decency. I need to read more of his writings, hopefully I will get the time to do so soon.

Energy is a great problem for mankind. It does pollute and cause all kinds of war and other troubles. I am sorry for this but I don't see any easy solutions to the energy problems only terrible decisions.

And we really do have to fear nuclear science. Here is a video to remind us of The Horrors of Nuclear Weapons:

YouTube - The Horrors of Nuclear Weapons

[esaruoho]

Originally Posted by Pythagorean

Energy is a great problem for mankind. It does pollute and cause all kinds of war and other troubles. I am sorry for this but I don't see any easy solutions to the energy problems only terrible decisions.

energy? look.. i really would recommend looking into alternative energy.by that i dont mean hydroturbines, windturbines and solar panels, geothermal energy. im talking about resonance based energy sources. im talking about people like walter russell, nathan stubblefield, ed leedskalnin, thomas henry moray, nikola tesla,john keely, wilhelm reich, howard johnson.. and many, many others. oh, viktor schauberger, hendershot, floyd sweet.

russell proves that this energy is accessible everywhere as long as we think clearly enough to be able to build up a conduit to let it be released into our physical reality. but not many people who study alternative, open energy systems, are aware of the immense contribution that walter russell gave us by explaining what gravity, electricity, light, the wave, magnetism, etc, truly are. many would be not-anymore lost in theories or weird jargon, and we would instead have functioning devices. as you know, walter russell was a big advocate for the hydrogen economy, as he displayed how to extract hydrogen from H2O by understanding what the elements are and how to change them at will. he also worked with NORAD for a optical-dynamo-generator that would extract energy straight from the cosmos by merely understanding how energy is meant to flow (conical coils, look into what viktor schauberger did understand from nature and its spiraling functions, notice that howard johnson proved that magnets have double vortices at both poles, notice that nikola tesla used spiraling coils and conical coils to enhance his electricity-effects, etc. and reich with his "two superimposed spirals, one breathing in, another breathing out" of orgone energy.)

many will react harshly to all this but without having done any research whatsoever. my looking into this has convinced me, that not only is it there, its there in endless abundance, just needs a fuller understanding of what is it that we are attempting to accomplish - that has always been explained by walter russell himself.

the alternatives for atomic power are here and have been here for hundreds of years, just ignored.