| |||||||||||
| |||||||
| Important Notice |
| Philosophy of Law Also called Jurisprudence, is the study how laws should best be used. How should Laws used to achieve Social and Political agendas? Should we obey the Law? |
![]() |
| | | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||||
| Re: Classic Law Problem
I'm no law student, but here's how I'd approach the matter assuming we can prove everything - Diane for attempted murder, Kate for murder. Posthumously award Ben a medal. |
| |||||
| Re: Classic Law Problem
Whoever did the damage is the killer in my opinion. Kate actually had influence on the death so Kate killed Ben. As simple as that. Diane should be punished as much as Kate though, because they are potentially the same in effect.
|
| |||||
| Re: Classic Law Problem
If Diane poisoned the canister and Kate didn't do squat, Diane is the murderer for sure. But Kate did puncture the canister, and Ben was spared the poision....
|
| |||||
| Re: Classic Law Problem
Does it matter that Kate's actions spared Ben the poison? Kate intended to harm Ben by eliminating his water supply, and had no knowledge of the poison.
|
| |||||
| Re: Classic Law Problem
That's the key, "Kate intended to harm Ben"; no doubt, there's attempted murder to be sent Kate's way, but the facts of the case is that poison was drained by Kate's action.
|
| |||||
| Re: Classic Law Problem
The physical act that killed Ben was that of Kate's, Diane had the Mens Rea, as did Kate, but it was Kate's Actus Reus that resulted in the demise of Ben. Since the poison was removed from Ben's canteen by Kate's action, wouldn't it be conceivable that Diane is now, technically, not guilty of anything? My understanding is that both Mens Rea and Actus Reus must be present to prove an offence. PaulG
__________________ Paul |
| |||||
| Re: Classic Law Problem
Is revenge for infidelity legal in Egypt? And if the cannister was punctured in Egypt but Ben died in Libya is there extradition? etc...
__________________ If a tree fell on a mime in the woods, would anybody care? |
| ||||
| Re: Classic Law Problem
I think Ben is the guilty one for having travelled beyond hope when noticing he had no water. I don't know if the two girls lived through the ordeal having never shared with Ben or after complete usage of all water, Ben continued to die while the girls found solice in gathering dew in the valley. I don't know, maybe I am the crazy one and I shudder, when I should crank. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Problem of Evil | TK421 | Philosophy of Religion | 59 | 01-07-2009 01:40 AM |
| Earth's Gas Problem | No0ne | Philosophy of Science | 5 | 09-19-2008 10:02 PM |
| Logic Problem | Holiday20310401 | Logic | 18 | 09-19-2008 05:27 PM |
| God is not a solution, but a problem | BRbeliever | Philosophy of Religion | 49 | 03-02-2008 12:23 AM |
| The 'perplexity' Problem | Pythagorean | General Discussion | 13 | 12-02-2006 08:39 PM |