Philosophy Forum  
Register Blogs Videos FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Philosophy Forum > Philosophy Forums > Branches of Philosophy > Philosophy of Language

Important Notice

Philosophy of Language The Philosophy of how Language effects our thoughts. Semantics, meaning, and interpretation. How does language effect our thoughts?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2008, 08:53 PM
VideCorSpoon's Avatar
Conspicuous Moronicus
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 778
Thanks: 491
Thanked 495 Times in 272 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 6
VideCorSpoon is a glorious beacon of lightVideCorSpoon is a glorious beacon of lightVideCorSpoon is a glorious beacon of lightVideCorSpoon is a glorious beacon of lightVideCorSpoon is a glorious beacon of lightVideCorSpoon is a glorious beacon of light
Can words hurt etymologically???

Can words hurt etymologically???

A feminist theorist, Stephanie Ross, says that words cannot hurt in this sense because no one understands the root of the words and how they were originally intended to be sexist. More likely, it is the "metaphor" the word evokes, the image it creates in our mind, that truly hurts.

Well... can the unknown origins of a word hurt us???
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2008, 10:09 PM
Aedes's Avatar
Death to Malaria
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,806
Thanks: 384
Thanked 554 Times in 435 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 8
Aedes is a name known to allAedes is a name known to allAedes is a name known to allAedes is a name known to allAedes is a name known to allAedes is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by VideCorSpoon View Post
Well... can the unknown origins of a word hurt us???
I'd say no, simply because (as we've seen) many words either gain or lose vulgarity and offense over time. So I agree that the origins of a word are irrelevant to a word's ability to offend -- it's the word's use and understanding that can offend.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2008, 06:11 AM
Didymos Thomas's Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 529
Thanked 459 Times in 374 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 8
Didymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of lightDidymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of lightDidymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of lightDidymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of lightDidymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of light
If the origin of the word is unknown to either party - the one using the word, and the one the word is directed towards - then there seems little room for the origin (of which both are ignorant) to be of much influence.

However, if I call someone X, where I understand the common usage of X and the etymology of X while the other person is only aware of the common usage, the origin of X may not harm the other person, but it will harm me.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2008, 10:10 AM
Full Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New York State
Posts: 781
Thanks: 8
Thanked 61 Times in 57 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 2
kennethamy will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by VideCorSpoon View Post
Can words hurt etymologically???

A feminist theorist, Stephanie Ross, says that words cannot hurt in this sense because no one understands the root of the words and how they were originally intended to be sexist. More likely, it is the "metaphor" the word evokes, the image it creates in our mind, that truly hurts.

Well... can the unknown origins of a word hurt us???
But the etymology of a word need not be what a word means, and generally is not, since the meanings of words change through time.

In any case, is the claim that the word can hurt us, or is the claim that it can harm us? I ask because I can see how something can harm us without our knowing it, but it is hard to see how something can hurt us without our knowing it.

Last edited by kennethamy; 03-10-2008 at 11:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2008, 01:39 PM
VideCorSpoon's Avatar
Conspicuous Moronicus
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 778
Thanks: 491
Thanked 495 Times in 272 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 6
VideCorSpoon is a glorious beacon of lightVideCorSpoon is a glorious beacon of lightVideCorSpoon is a glorious beacon of lightVideCorSpoon is a glorious beacon of lightVideCorSpoon is a glorious beacon of lightVideCorSpoon is a glorious beacon of light
So, if I were to play devil’s advocate, what if I call a woman a “chick.” This is a commonly used word. Heck, even some women use it to refer to themselves. But “chick” is parallel to “chick,” the small defenseless bird that eventually grows up to merely produce eggs and offspring. Then, I have heard woman referred to as “birds” before in rap music. The common usage overtime does not negate the identical word “chick” to different definitions with different connotations, nor the propagation from the root of the word to mean more offensive things.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Big words socrato General Discussion 42 10-15-2008 09:12 PM
If pictures says a thousand words....... <daleader> General Discussion 2 06-06-2008 04:06 PM
Ah, words de Silentio Memorable Quotes 2 05-08-2008 10:14 PM
Words of Wisdom Israelite007 Philosophy of Religion 24 04-06-2008 01:45 PM



vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright 2006-2008 PhilosophyForum.com