Philosophy Forum  
Register Blogs Videos FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Philosophy Forum > Philosophy Forums > Young Philosophers Forum

Important Notice

Young Philosophers Forum Philosophy and general discussion for young philosophers ages 13 - 17.

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2008, 12:45 AM
Holiday20310401's Avatar
Abstractualist
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: near a writing utencil, Canada
Posts: 1,173
Thanks: 362
Thanked 171 Times in 138 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 3
Holiday20310401 has a spectacular aura aboutHoliday20310401 has a spectacular aura about
Re: Athiests...

Does anybody here see any potential that a divine being with a separate entity has on the universe as far as we know it?! Ofcourse not. If so, plz point it out, what a revelation it would be indeed.
I mean, what is the moral consensus for God's existence relying upon 'faith'
I guess I'm not tuned with most people I know who see false potential as having meaning, like blind assertion to irrationale reasoning.
I don't know what I am b'c there seems to be mixed definitions for atheism. I just think that God's meanings have truth and should be carried out and define what humanity should strive for, but do not require a separate entity or symbol to call them real, that only adds to the immorality that has been caused.
__________________
My country is the world and my religion is to do good. - Unsure who said this.
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2008, 06:39 PM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 21
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
SantaMonica1369 is on a distinguished road
Re: Athiests...

If you're completely nonaligned in your belief, not believing in a God or any other higher deity, its completely within itself, and only that. By that I mean that we are not a religion, therefore we are nothing in the subject. We aren't a catagory because we don't need to be. There is nothing that defines us. You may say our lack of belief does, but that's nothing. It doesn't count. Its like a flat out 0 or infinity, the colors white or black, a baseline. There is no need for throwing a complicated deffinition on it or trying to put it in a catagory, because it has no specific points that define it. More, a lack of specific points. The athiests that reject God, I can see being catagorized. But those that don't give a hoot either way? Why catagorize them?
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 08:42 AM
Khethil's Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 742
Thanks: 214
Thanked 292 Times in 214 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 4
Khethil is a jewel in the roughKhethil is a jewel in the roughKhethil is a jewel in the roughKhethil is a jewel in the rough
Re: Athiests...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SantaMonica1369 View Post
If you're completely nonaligned in your belief, not believing in a God or any other higher deity, its completely within itself, and only that. By that I mean that we are not a religion, therefore we are nothing in the subject. We aren't a catagory because we don't need to be. There is nothing that defines us. You may say our lack of belief does, but that's nothing. It doesn't count. Its like a flat out 0 or infinity, the colors white or black, a baseline. There is no need for throwing a complicated deffinition on it or trying to put it in a catagory, because it has no specific points that define it. More, a lack of specific points. The athiests that reject God, I can see being catagorized. But those that don't give a hoot either way? Why catagorize them?
Yea, no one lies to be pigeonholed, particularly with some of the negative overtones words tend to carry.

The way I look at it is this: Words help us communicate. If someone were to ask (for example) "Hey, how does Bill look at religion?" it's much easier to say "He's agnostic" rather than "Well, he's nothing on the subject. He's not completely non-aligned on the belief, not believing in god or any higher deity. He isn't a category because he doesn't need to be. It's like a 'zero'".

Just has to do with defintions helping us communicate. That's all, but I share your feelings on being categorized per say (especially when a definition doesn't quite fit".

... hoping this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 09:29 PM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 21
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
SantaMonica1369 is on a distinguished road
Re: Athiests...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Khethil View Post
Yea, no one lies to be pigeonholed, particularly with some of the negative overtones words tend to carry.

The way I look at it is this: Words help us communicate. If someone were to ask (for example) "Hey, how does Bill look at religion?" it's much easier to say "He's agnostic" rather than "Well, he's nothing on the subject. He's not completely non-aligned on the belief, not believing in god or any higher deity. He isn't a category because he doesn't need to be. It's like a 'zero'".

Just has to do with defintions helping us communicate. That's all, but I share your feelings on being categorized per say (especially when a definition doesn't quite fit".

... hoping this helps.
Yeah, that does help, and that is true. Although that then just leads me to wonder, why do we have to bother debating these things at all? How much religious info doesn't need to be said unless we're asked to elaborate?
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2008, 04:32 PM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 91
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
OntheWindowStand is on a distinguished road
Re: Athiests...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Khethil View Post
I love it! Simple, honest questions that have simple, honest answers. I hope not to offend any honest believers out there, but my answer is straightforward and from the heart.

For me, there's just no reason to believe something so silly - one would think in the 3rd millennium that we'd be past such dumbness. Humans have such capacity for love, sharing, fellowship and discovery. As long as we hold to ancient myths, the longer we'll stay divided and at arms length to our brothers and sisters. Beliefs in god have the potential for giving great comfort to the individual, but they hurt our species in numerous ways.

Nice question. I hope my response is well-received.
Everyone has a god saying you believe there isnt one means you think you are your own god
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2008, 10:17 PM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 21
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
SantaMonica1369 is on a distinguished road
Re: Athiests...

No, it says you're independent of religious beliefs.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2008, 12:00 AM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 91
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
OntheWindowStand is on a distinguished road
Re: Athiests...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SantaMonica1369 View Post
No, it says you're independent of religious beliefs.
LOL atheism is a religion
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2008, 12:50 AM
Aedes's Avatar
Death to Malaria
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,806
Thanks: 383
Thanked 554 Times in 435 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 8
Aedes is a name known to allAedes is a name known to allAedes is a name known to allAedes is a name known to allAedes is a name known to allAedes is a name known to all
Re: Athiests...

Quote:
Originally Posted by OntheWindowStand View Post
atheism is a religion
Hardly... it's a lack of belief that can be arrived at many different ways. In and of itself atheism is not predictive of ANY other affirmative or negative belief; atheism does not have a type of "practice"; atheism does not have a doctrine; and atheism does not have a tradition. Atheism isn't a 'system' of beliefs -- it's a specific lack of belief in a specific concept, and one cannot generalize further based on that alone.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Aedes For This Useful Post:
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2008, 01:41 PM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 91
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
OntheWindowStand is on a distinguished road
Re: Athiests...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aedes View Post
Hardly... it's a lack of belief that can be arrived at many different ways. In and of itself atheism is not predictive of ANY other affirmative or negative belief; atheism does not have a type of "practice"; atheism does not have a doctrine; and atheism does not have a tradition. Atheism isn't a 'system' of beliefs -- it's a specific lack of belief in a specific concept, and one cannot generalize further based on that alone.
\

It takes faith to be a atheist and there is more to it then lack of belief of god. Followers of atheism often try to convert people like other religions it hates other religions like other religions do. It holds many of the same characteristics of a religion "set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs." In the quotes is the definition of religion. Atheism concerns the cause, nature and purpose of the universe. It also has a moral code. It states no god which still falls under the second point of the definition as well. This is because ones disbelief in any god has identical effect on someone that might believe in a number of other "gods". And that effect is that it changes there way of living, thinking and their view on life.
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2008, 10:07 PM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 0
PursuitOfReality is on a distinguished road
Re: Athiests...

Quote:
Originally Posted by OntheWindowStand View Post
\

It takes faith to be a atheist and there is more to it then lack of belief of god. Followers of atheism often try to convert people like other religions it hates other religions like other religions do. It holds many of the same characteristics of a religion "set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs." In the quotes is the definition of religion. Atheism concerns the cause, nature and purpose of the universe. It also has a moral code. It states no god which still falls under the second point of the definition as well. This is because ones disbelief in any god has identical effect on someone that might believe in a number of other "gods". And that effect is that it changes there way of living, thinking and their view on life.
Huh, how does it take more faith? This is impossible for all atheists, because not all atheist try to convert people. I know I don't care if you believe in a god or not. I do care if your "moral" codes leaks into my life by rule of law or other forced means. I'm against all moral codes btw! Hasty generalizations make you look very foolish. I didn't read your entire diatribe(not worth my time), so I probably missed other nonsense you spewed.

Now onto the OP, I feel like I became an atheist instinctively. I was unable to believe in the stories my mother taught me from the Bible and she had to tell me they were just moral stories. I did believe in that god, but I asked a lot of questions when I was young. I must of been agnostic Christian early on. I became an atheist at 12 because nothing worked and the Bible never made sense to me. Prayer never worked, god never talked to me, and I never had a spiritual experience as the religious describe the phenomena.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.philosophyforum.com/forum/philosophy-forums/young-philosophers-forum/1453-atheists.html
Posted By For Type Date
tldagent's profile - StumbleUpon This thread Refback 07-28-2008 10:34 PM



vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright 2006-2008 PhilosophyForum.com