Philosophy Forum  
Register Blogs Videos FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Philosophy Forum > Philosophy Forums > Branches of Philosophy > Philosophy of Religion

Important Notice

Philosophy of Religion The philosophical study of religious beliefs, doctrines, and history. Focused more on the whole and not any certain Religion.. What is God? Theology - study of nature of God and religious truth. Theology uses documents, philosophy uses reason.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2008, 05:49 PM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 100
Thanks: 9
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
Dave Allen is on a distinguished road
Interesting Lecture on "New Atheism" by John Gray

The New Atheism: Theos/LICC lecture by Professor John Gray -Times Online

I'm reading a lot of John Gray at the moment and, whilst a rather unsettling and pessimistic philosopher, I find that I'm getting a lot out of his books.

I rather like this lecture he recently gave in criticism of the "New Atheism" that seems to be generating a lot of column inches at the moment. Whilst John Gray is a sceptical thinker with little time for religion (bar Taoism which he seems rather fond of) he does devote a deal of his writings to opposing atheism as well, and seems to regard Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchins et al as being as dogmatic as religious evangelists.

I don't quite agree with Gray in regards to certain details (I don't think the "New Atheists" are in the process of deifying humanity, for example) but I find his defence very interesting and he has a lot to say about the role of certain philosophers such as Nietzsche and Spinoza in this lecture.

I was wondering what other people here think, if they've read any of his books or what they make of the content of the lecture.
Reply With Quote
The following users say: THANK YOU - Dave Allen for the above post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2008, 10:17 PM
Didymos Thomas's Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 529
Thanked 459 Times in 374 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 8
Didymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of lightDidymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of lightDidymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of lightDidymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of lightDidymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Interesting Lecture on "New Atheism" by John Gray

I'll have to watch this when I find some time. I'm happy to hear that there are some atheist scholars out there who are mature enough to recognize Dawkins and Hitchins for what they are.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2008, 12:11 AM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 376
Thanks: 82
Thanked 78 Times in 62 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
Solace will become famous soon enough
Re: Interesting Lecture on "New Atheism" by John Gray

Quote:
with little time for religion (bar Taoism which he seems rather fond of)
I just recently read the Tao Te Ching and there is no doubt that someone could copy a lot of passages from it, paste them in the Bible and attribute it to Christ, and few Christians would be able to tell the difference. I don't mean this to suggest that they'd be fooled, only that much of what is written in the Tao Te Ching is echoed in the Bible, some of it nearly word for word. I think that people, both religious and non, would do well to see past Christian dogma and pay attention to what scripture is actually teaching.
Reply With Quote
The following users say: THANK YOU - Solace for the above post!
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
atheism, christopher hitchins, john gray, richard dawkins

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Godel does not tell us what "true" statements are thus theorem is meaningless pam69ur Logic 0 04-06-2008 06:55 AM
Article: "Laws of Nature, Source Unknown" Pythagorean General Discussion 1 12-22-2007 03:19 AM
"ALICE IN WONDERLAND" 1933 All Star Cast Pythagorean General Discussion 0 11-13-2007 06:04 PM
MICROSOFT "Vista" promoted with SPACE RIDE prize Pythagorean News and World Events 3 02-07-2007 02:37 PM



vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright 2006-2008 PhilosophyForum.com