Philosophy Forum  
Register Blogs Videos FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Philosophy Forum > Philosophy Forums > Branches of Philosophy > Philosophy of Religion

Important Notice

Philosophy of Religion The philosophical study of religious beliefs, doctrines, and history. Focused more on the whole and not any certain Religion.. What is God? Theology - study of nature of God and religious truth. Theology uses documents, philosophy uses reason.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2008, 10:30 PM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: in all things
Posts: 27
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
mashiaj is on a distinguished road
paradox of the eternallity of god

considering that god has no beginning or end, its eternal, infinite, limitless.
supposing that god ceases (end) to exist now then hes mortal or finite?

the answer is no because if we start from the point that god ended and look
backwards we would see no end. therefore god has existed an infinite amount of time before his end and then god is still and be ever eternal, limitless, infinite even if god ceases to exist now.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2008, 10:50 PM
Holiday20310401's Avatar
Abstractualist
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: near a writing utencil, Canada
Posts: 1,175
Thanks: 362
Thanked 171 Times in 138 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 3
Holiday20310401 has a spectacular aura aboutHoliday20310401 has a spectacular aura about
Re: paradox of the eternallity of god

Then infinite must mean that a future and a past must both exist in infinite proportion.

If something were to cease to exist after having an infinite time before it ceased to exist then it could not cease to exist.

Because if something were to cease to exist then there could be no relative point (being the cease of existence) to the time before that occurrence. Otherwise the time before that would be finite. There are no distinguishings between relative points in an infinite, being that of a loop. Either all true or all false, therefore implying symmetry. Any piece of information that is relative, must come from a source and be taken to a source (in respect to time), there must be a beginning and an end.

If only one of the two were to exist, like in this paradox being that of only the end, then the existence would be undefined because information would not have a cause but the effect is linear. If only the beginning existed and there was no end then is would be without cause because it would be defined by the beginning but to no means of its end. It would have to be non relational, because relation provides reason, and potential to another relative point.

So I would think of this paradox as being irrational, impossible.

An infinite will always form a loop otherwise it can't be infinite.

If one thinks otherwise then tel me, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-22-2008, 02:04 AM
GoshisDead's Avatar
Member: Team Obvious
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 207
Thanks: 35
Thanked 33 Times in 26 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
GoshisDead is on a distinguished road
Re: paradox of the eternallity of god

Its a trick statement, because now is always now, never in the past or the future. Or one can argue that there is no past and there is no future, so given the existence of God s/he has always existed and always will.
__________________
If a tree fell on a mime in the woods, would anybody care?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-22-2008, 04:24 AM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: in all things
Posts: 27
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
mashiaj is on a distinguished road
Re: paradox of the eternallity of god

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holiday20310401 View Post
Then infinite must mean that a future and a past must both exist in infinite proportion.
why proportion? are u thinking that the infinite is dividable?

ok lets assumpt that backwards its an eternallity of time and tomorrow time(whatever) ceases eternallity+1=eternallity, eternallity+6=eternallity,
eternallity+10000=eternallity, eternallity+1000000000000000=eternallity.
no matter how much time you add to eternallity it is still the same.

infinite is not dividable it is irrational, all rations are finite therefore all infinite is irrational.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 02:40 AM
Holiday20310401's Avatar
Abstractualist
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: near a writing utencil, Canada
Posts: 1,175
Thanks: 362
Thanked 171 Times in 138 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 3
Holiday20310401 has a spectacular aura aboutHoliday20310401 has a spectacular aura about
Re: paradox of the eternallity of god

sorry, proportion was a bad word, ofcourse it can't be divided.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 02:47 PM
GoshisDead's Avatar
Member: Team Obvious
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 207
Thanks: 35
Thanked 33 Times in 26 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
GoshisDead is on a distinguished road
Re: paradox of the eternallity of god

Past and future are really meaningless terms in the realm of eternity. It seems there there is a past because we have memory of the duration of our existence. It seems that there is a future based on a consitently confirmed inference of memory of past duration transitioning into the now. In the argument that God has existed and always will exist is really just saying God exists now. It is possible that a God would be outside the realm of past present future duration and experience.
__________________
If a tree fell on a mime in the woods, would anybody care?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2008, 03:49 AM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: in all things
Posts: 27
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
mashiaj is on a distinguished road
Re: paradox of the eternallity of god

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoshisDead View Post
Past and future are really meaningless terms in the realm of eternity. It seems there there is a past because we have memory of the duration of our existence. It seems that there is a future based on a consitently confirmed inference of memory of past duration transitioning into the now. In the argument that God has existed and always will exist is really just saying God exists now. It is possible that a God would be outside the realm of past present future duration and experience.
they don't exist in that realm.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2008, 06:24 AM
Doobah47's Avatar
Full Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East London
Posts: 233
Thanks: 2
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
Doobah47 is on a distinguished road
Re: paradox of the eternallity of god

There's no paradox if we consider that this ideology of an infinite existence places dimensions as individual facets of an infinite environment; the dimensions could reach a state of stagnation (ceasing to project further into infinity, but not having reached any end). The notion of infinity tends to demand that a dimension continues consistently (like time or depth), yet it is surely possible that a somewhat telescopic reach by the dimension could result in the dimension beginning an alternative mode of projection, continuing to reach out but forming a pattern similar to a sound wave, thus eventually oscillating so much so that it ceases to move forward... If light is formed by waves then a dimension such as depth, although metaphysical not should surely follow suit - considering that depth might require sight, the tip of the telescopic dimension seeing a potential for continued projection.

Time is more interesting because it is a dimension without foundation in reality, so perhaps prescribing a waveform of time is completely useless, for it does not adhere to any sense of rhythm - humans have simply assigned symbolic gestures of seconds etc.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2008, 06:42 AM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: in all things
Posts: 27
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
mashiaj is on a distinguished road
Re: paradox of the eternallity of god

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doobah47 View Post
There's no paradox if we consider that this ideology of an infinite existence places dimensions as individual facets of an infinite environment; the dimensions could reach a state of stagnation (ceasing to project further into infinity, but not having reached any end). The notion of infinity tends to demand that a dimension continues consistently (like time or depth), yet it is surely possible that a somewhat telescopic reach by the dimension could result in the dimension beginning an alternative mode of projection, continuing to reach out but forming a pattern similar to a sound wave, thus eventually oscillating so much so that it ceases to move forward... If light is formed by waves then a dimension such as depth, although metaphysical not should surely follow suit - considering that depth might require sight, the tip of the telescopic dimension seeing a potential for continued projection.

Time is more interesting because it is a dimension without foundation in reality, so perhaps prescribing a waveform of time is completely useless, for it does not adhere to any sense of rhythm - humans have simply assigned symbolic gestures of seconds etc.
nonsense....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Paradox Arjen Metaphysics 6 10-22-2008 04:42 PM
Moral Paradox. Pessimist Ethics 22 06-12-2008 07:14 PM
On Meno’s Paradox saiboimushi Epistemology 2 02-15-2008 05:49 PM
Paradox of Potential popped Aware. PoPpAScience Metaphysics 26 11-16-2007 07:04 PM
simple paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalides it pam69ur Epistemology 1 10-05-2007 05:25 AM



vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright 2006-2008 PhilosophyForum.com