| |||||||||||
| |||||||
| Important Notice |
| Philosophy of Religion The philosophical study of religious beliefs, doctrines, and history. Focused more on the whole and not any certain Religion.. What is God? Theology - study of nature of God and religious truth. Theology uses documents, philosophy uses reason. |
![]() |
| | | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||||
|
Would you think it worth noting that most people, myself included, would probably object if you claimed that "fire, water, wind, earth, and unknown" are the "elements of observable creation"?
|
| |||||
|
I'm not sure what you are trying to say but have you ever seen the movie the fifth element? Yes there is agreebly 5 elements do you mean to say the elements weren't created?
|
| |||||
|
I'm saying I see no reason to believe that these five "elements" (as nothing you listed is actually an 'element', at least not in any of my science classes) are the components of "observable creation". Sure, there is water, fire, earth, wind, and things I know nothing about. But each of these "elements" is comprised of something non-"element". |
| |||||
|
Okay Didymos so either you are saying that Fire,wind,water can't be observed (observable) or your saying fire,wind,etc isn't created (creation) can you clairfy?
Last edited by Israelite007; 03-17-2008 at 06:00 PM. |
| |||||
|
On further note I am speaking according to the elements found in philosophy not science. Look up chinese or greek philosophy you will find these elements I speak of usually the fifth one differs on all ends whether in chinese philosophy metal or greek idea or also known as void by japenese but again this is a spiritual philosophy so the fifth element applies to unknown (as I have heard it used before but more modern philosophy)
Last edited by Israelite007; 03-17-2008 at 06:14 PM. |
| |||||
|
Most cultures you mention have a four-element structure because it originates around 4000 years ago with the proto-Indoeuropean culture. Everything from India through Scandinavia was deeply influenced by this, and there are overlapping religious, philosophical, and linguistic cognates in all of these cultures. Chinese philosophy has both metal and wood and as far as I know there is no unknown. But it doesn't matter -- if you want you can add "unknown" as a 6th element if there are already 5. But how can "unknown" be an element? |
| |||||
|
Well Aedes what happened you see I actually picked this up in my life not my idea really. As I gone on to say I was a huge party kid. Well there was this production company who put on 5 parties called the Elements. in Succession they were. Wind,Water,Earth,Fire, and the Unknown Element. I only got to go to fire. I think the reason for it being "unknown" is because the eastern philosophy doesn't agree on this one. Japenese has void Greek has Idea and Chinese has Metal and wood. These are all the 5th elements (Not sure which one is chinese). I applied the unknown since I can't forget where I have come from this is me remembering my past in a good light. |
| |||||
|
The Chinese elements are: Wood, Earth, Water, Metal, Fire But again, these are traditional ways of describing the material world in a time that predates science. You could just as easily start from scratch and describe solid/liquid/gas. Ancient Greece applied certain qualities to the elements, i.e. hot / cold and moist / dry. From these they derived the four bodily humors, namely blood, phlegm, black bile, and yellow bile, and these in turn led to the qualities associated with the humors (blood = sanguine or happy; phlegm = phlegmatic or apathetic/lazy; black bile = melancholic; yellow bile = choleric or wrathful). Galen (who was from ancient Rome) systematized these in his medical writings, which became completely engrained in Western medicine up until people like Vesalius started questioning the actual science behind it in the 16th century and afterwards. In other words, during the Enlightenment Europe began to cast off this traditional conception of science, which permeated everything in life. And part of the reason it lasted so long was that the material elements were tied to orthodox philosophical systems, and were very difficult to discard. I love the poetry in all these different ancient systems, and I think they work allegorically. But they no longer serve as a material truth, and I'm not sure that you need to invoke them for your philosophical ideas. |
| The following users say: THANK YOU - Aedes for the above post! | ||
| |||||
|
Nice Input Aedes. The reason I display these statements about life as elements is because they are some of the more difficult questions to ask 1.What is the meaning of Life? A military raver told me he searched his whole life to find the answer to this question and said it was love or lack thereof i don't disagree with him 2. What is the nature of life? this is answer to this question was found thanks to Justin who said Quote:
The Nature of Life* Quote:
3. What is the Quality of Life? The quality of life is when everything is in balance again thanks for the comment by Justin Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality_of_life Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form Form in philosophy The word has had various usages in philosophy. It has been used to translate the Platonic idea (eidos), the permanent reality which makes a thing what it is, in contrast with the thing's particulars, which are finite and subject to change This is thanks to alot of you and again the promptings of the Holy Spirit. 5. and finally What is the Message of Life? Yes this question may not even exist in the realm of philsopohy but what about theology? just google "message of life" and what is the first result? A religious ministry! So of course the message of life is GOD but get this the first result is a ministry in Loveland,Colorado my hometown and my current resisdence! This is like a sign from heaven no doubt! just search and find out! It should be noted that these are not the only questions about life. Just the 5 main aspects of life that apply to the 5 elements. and friends please remember alot of this spiritual philosophy has to do with your input so please remember that when you comment at discrediting this method of understanding. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Godel does not tell us what "true" statements are thus theorem is meaningless | pam69ur | Logic | 0 | 04-06-2008 06:55 AM |
| Article: "Laws of Nature, Source Unknown" | Pythagorean | General Discussion | 1 | 12-22-2007 03:19 AM |
| "ALICE IN WONDERLAND" 1933 All Star Cast | Pythagorean | General Discussion | 0 | 11-13-2007 06:04 PM |
| MICROSOFT "Vista" promoted with SPACE RIDE prize | Pythagorean | News and World Events | 3 | 02-07-2007 02:37 PM |