| |||||||||||
| |||||||
| Important Notice |
| Epistemology The Philosophy of Knowledge. Is knowledge really important and in what ways is knowledge acquired? Rationalism or Empiricism? |
![]() |
| | | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| ||||
| Re: The Selfish Nature Of All Actions That's your argument, again? Words have meanings. "Selfish" is an English word, and "selfish" has a meaning. And it means nothing like what you and MFTP say it means. Since when does either of you have some special insight into what words mean?
|
| |||||
| Re: The Selfish Nature Of All Actions Quote:
"Model, like so many words in the English language, has a multitude of meanings depending on the context in which it is used." Context defines you might say!! Last edited by boagie; 02-05-2008 at 05:17 PM. |
| |||||
| Re: The Selfish Nature Of All Actions This rapidly became a really immature discussion, however, I have to stick with Boagie on this one saying that because a word don't have a clear meaning you have to explain what you refer it too, if you would try you can probably find dictionarys that say two completly different things about the same word or even find one that you just KNOW is wrong (verbs can sometimes be explained as something they just aren't in reality) and this leads to the fact that a word can have several meanings depending on who you ask or in what context it's used... As I've said several times: for me (for example) selfish isn't a sinister or evil action in anyway, it's just a self-profit motive behind an action.. Thus I said this earlier:
__________________ "When men are pure, laws are useless; when men are corrupt, laws are broken." - Benjamin Disraeli http://www.wizzyofsweden.com |
| |||||
| Re: The Selfish Nature Of All Actions Quote:
Understood! |
| ||||
| Re: The Selfish Nature Of All Actions Quote:
It can be said that one who only seeks his own ends (that this is the only conceivable understanding of human action is what I have been arguing) is selfish. But when we take the common understanding of the word, it implies that one is only concerned with his own well-being. I have not been using the word, and I have not changed the meaning of it. I have only said that it can be confusing when viewed in multiple contexts, and that I do not wish to use it because of that. Phenomenology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) |
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| ||||
| Quote:
I have already presented a clear example of the mother who leaves two pieces of cake for her two sons. If each takes his own piece of cake, and leaves the other for his brother, there is pursuit of his own want, but he is not being selfish. If one of them wants not only his own piece of cake, but takes his brother's, then he is pursuing his own want, and he is also being selfish. That is what the word "selfish" means. Words have meanings. If people could use a word with whatever meaning they please, communication would break down. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| selfish action, selfish nature, selfishness |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Selfish or Altruistic | Joe | Philosophy of Religion | 2 | 10-26-2008 09:05 AM |
| Do we have control over our actions? | Binyamin Tsadik | Metaphysics | 89 | 10-24-2008 05:39 PM |
| Are all good actions good? Are all bad actions bad? | Wizzy | Ethics | 19 | 04-20-2008 09:27 AM |