If God was a member of the forum

[Holiday20310401]

I think we can all come to agreement on how we view God as being a perfect being in some sense, a divine of he ultimate kinda thing. I'm not asking for your opinion of God's existence or actuality, just what it would be like if it was a member of the forum. ( Lets also look at the 'forum' as a symbol for community, society ).

When I thought about this I came to the conclusion that God's moral perfection keeps God from showing any experiential mingling with humanity. (that is, if God exists).

• If you had a question who would you turn to for answers? If you decided that you didn't want to hear perfection then you would be excluding God any therefore giving it no reason to be on the forum.
• If you wanted an opinion would God be able to provide you with any or would God's perfection be able to establish the truth. What is saner; humanity's certainty allowing for doubt and therefore theory and progress, or humanity's automatic truth unveiled.
• You would realise that the reason for turning to God is lost in the very essence of God's reality. You would mingle with God for its potential so as to have a higher potential in society. But what potential is that when everyone else will turn to God the same way you would. (I'm not saying you would of course). Therefore everyone's potential, purpose, and humanity's very meaning becomes lost because of the nature for our obsession to strive for perfection; once we have it within our grasp without having to reach for it we as a society become insane. Yet the idea of striving for perfection to me is what make us sane.
• The only reason why we'd allow ourselves to mingle with God if a member of the forum would be for irrationale reasons therefore logic can't be our intentions in this scenario. Our will would be taken over by emotion and ego which if the majority of our intent is controlled by, would make us all insane.

[MySiddhi]

Originally Posted by Holiday20310401

Therefore everyone's potential, purpose, and humanity's very meaning becomes lost because of the nature for our obsession to strive for perfection; once we have it within our grasp without having to reach for it we as a society become insane. Yet the idea of striving for perfection to me is what make us sane.

Who could possibly grasp the present without an intensity?

[VideCorSpoon]

God would be one of those members that signed on at the very beginning, gave a vague introduction and didn’t post again, though you could possibly reach it (God) through personal messaging.

Why? If god did post anything, it would (among other things) denote some level of partiality. And partiality is a flaw. If God is a perfect being, he could not be partial. I’ve been partial to the view of God in the way Aristotle thought of God, an unmoved mover (of which, note the irony of me being partial... which would mean both I myself am flawed and further my potentially problematic conception as well).

So if I could ask God anything, I don’t know if it would directly answer it’s e-mail… which is perhaps an angelfire.com account. (As a side note, I am a Roman Catholic and I like grilled cheese sandwiches, so I do not dispute Gods existence, only the form of God’s existence. “God” is in a sense a descriptor for unexplainable phenomena… at least that’s as far as I have been able to think of it as.)

It's a good hypothetical question Holiday!

But if God could answer a question on the forum, I think I would ask,"how would you describe yourself?"

As another side note, I believe someone should arbitrarily create a user on this forum named God… Think about it, it's a phenomenal brain scratch. A physical (well, digital) embodiment of an abstract concept that could be referenced within both the rational, empirical, and theological frameworks of philosophy. If someone asked for the proof of God, all they need do is link to God (the forum users) introduction since God is among many things an abstract concept. It's a rationalist (and empiricist) catch 22 on theological grounds.

[Holiday20310401]

The next time somebody refers someone to join this forum tell that person to name their account "God". lol.

[one-philosophy]

God would say something simple and easy to understand. According to some passages of bible, God does not cause confusion. Rather, that is the devil as it is he who causes confusion....
....My brain hurts

[FatalMuse]

If God exists, he is already a member of this forum in that he is represented by every individual member.

[andykelly]

Originally Posted by FatalMuse

If God exists, he is already a member of this forum in that he is represented by every individual member.

Took the words right out of my mouth except I have no doubt there's a God - the only question I really have is the true nature of God.

[Fido]

Perfection. I wouldn't know it if I saw it, but it is a jinx word to me. I ask people not to use the P word around me. I do like what the Muslims say, that only Allah is perfect, and I like that they avoid perfection as sacrilage. Such things as perfection are infinites, and are an object of essholes. Perfection cannot be reached, but it can make a lot of people miserable. If Good enough is really good enough for us, it must be good enough for God. And I have never heard of God, perfect, or otherwise ever asking perfection from people. Asking some one to be better does not drive anyone further away from perfection, as an infinitely distant ideal; but the impossible task often does. So, and in conclusion; I don't think you can prove a perfect God any more than you can prove a God, and if God does exist on some level, Then God does not need proof, is beyond proof, or before it, and is beyond conception, as perfect or otherwise. I think you can prove in your life and in others that perfection is a goal well worth avoiding. It has ruined more lives than bad coffee and cigarettes.

[midas77]

If God is a member of this forum, I think he will just lurk around reading post as if a guest. I don't think he will ever post for it will certainly create factions around us making us unitarians, methodists, orthodox, catholics, moslems etc. To avoid making us cut its other throat, he might adhere himself to silence. And if he ever post, he will just be GOD RANDOM saying Da and Ja for any question, us not knowing whether by Ja he means false or true.

My first question to God is the winning lottery combination.

[Fido]

Originally Posted by midas77

If God is a member of this forum, I think he will just lurk around reading post as if a guest. I don't think he will ever post for it will certainly create factions around us making us unitarians, methodists, orthodox, catholics, moslems etc. To avoid making us cut its other throat, he might adhere himself to silence. And if he ever post, he will just be GOD RANDOM saying Da and Ja for any question, us not knowing whether by Ja he means false or true.

My first question to God is the winning lottery combination.

That answer is easy. Don't play, and if you get another chance, don't play twice.