
03-28-2007, 06:46 PM
|
| Full Member | | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: CO
Posts: 55
Thanks: 4
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 2 | |
| Re: The nature of the Almighty
For this, there is not something that started God, it is just assumed that God always was, which is not an argument but a statement. Quote: | The Almighty cannot lie for if He speaks it. It will be | So there are things God can't do Quote: | " According to science community after the big bang all was like dust. So it is possible that all matter and space where at rest or evenly balanced like as if all the air on earth was the same temperature with even amount of humidity and pressure | This is not correct. All was not uniform after the big bang, current theory holds that there were slight perturbations which grew as the universe expanded, which is currently seen in the non-uniform distribution of mass throughout the universe. The initial perturbations resulted from the uneven "surface" of the colliding membranes which resulted in the big bang. No external, sentient, guiding agent was required for anything in the universe to form. It is only by assuming that the universe required sentience that the need for a creator is created. To think of it as something that would otherwise be random if it were not for a directing agent is also not correct, since everything obeys the laws of physics that could not be otherwise for this universe. To require a reason for why the laws are what they are is to create a need for an explanation for something that is not there, it is only manifested inn one's mind. Quote: | Where as, it could be considered, that if under certain conditions of time, energy, space, and matter, there is manifested the presence of life. Which was already there. In other words the presence of Life is always there but not always evident to us, unless certain conditions are met. | If this is saying that life, like rock, water, plasma, etc is one possible arrangement of matter that is permitted by the laws of physics, then yes. If it is trying to say that life is some kind of pre-existing essence that uses matter as a conduit to manifest itself in physical space, then this is just another description of the concept of a soul or spirit. Presuming that this exists, then saying that science can't explain it, therefore God does, is not a valid argument. Smilies, heed my call! |