Okay, why isn't it scientifically rigorous? Neutral it's not, but, is
anything neutral and unbiased? I have a bias, you have a bias.
But still, do you believe it is plausible for a system so complex to have come about by random chance...the odds against it are overwhelming. And science can't explain
why the Big Bang happened:
Life against the odds..
When scientists can't answer, philosophers attempt to.
There had to be, by logical neccesity, an eternally existent Object, since an infinite regress makes no logical sense whatsoever, in my mind, or else there would be, and always would've been, nothing.