What is more ethical in the present era? Having a world nation, the world consisting of only 1 country, society type, whatever you'd call it; or the way it is in reality?
By having a world nation I mean everybody having an equal lifestyle, therefore most certainly implying averaging lifestyles so as to create equality.
Does a world wide mergence imply...
- the need to abandon religion or unify it.
- would the outcome be of an anarchy or democracy or totalitarian?
- I'm sure that it is impossible but that kind of thinking defies the point of conversation here.
- Once establishing worldwide nation would there be peace or would it evoke hate.
- would the public be allowed to know of an actual mergence?
- would it be economically beneficial to everybody
- would there just be moral chaos or allow for a broader view of rationalizing?
- Would it be a complex bureaucracy, or simple ( no its not fun to consider the fact that the system would probably just branch off into subnational 'bureaus' anyways)
- Would scientific progress become stagnant or become more innovative?
- Would this just evoke a World War 3 due to potential instability, and therefore providing the chance to destroy humanity making the unity concept completely irrational for our time. Or would the World War three be a stage to the completion of a world wide single nation?