View Single Post
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2008, 06:12 PM
Zetherin Zetherin is online now
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 284
Thanks: 38
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 1
Zetherin is on a distinguished road
Re: How do Christians possibly rationalize these things?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zetetic11235 View Post
How do some of the posters rationalize these things:
shameless ignorance
Holding beliefes in light of their inherent fallacies

To say christians allow for such evils is so fallacious that I am not sure where to start, and I see thomas d to be a drowning voice of reason in this.

To say that any group so broad as christians can be held accountable is fallacious due to that fact that it presumes a nonexistent homogeny. To misunderstand ancient laws as given truth is fallacious and most christians do not advocate such a belief, only an outspoken and ingorant minority.

To accuse christianity itself of any evils is absurd, it is those who wish to further themselfs who use christianity as a tool for their own ends who are to be held accountable, not those who find value in a set of ideals contained in an ancient text.
I do not attack communists and other collectivists for supression of peoples or the millions of death caused by bastardisations of their movement. I do not do this because I recognize the good intent inherent in the movement and those who have in the past believed in it. I do not attack those who belong to a group that is guilty of evils for if I did so I would not only be a hypocrite but a mysanthrope.

I myself do not consider myself a christian, I am a humanist and a rational positivist. The very structure of this attack is ludicrous and simplistic to the point that I could almost consider it moronic.
You have a solid point, and we shouldn't presumptuously accuse all Christians of advocating such things.

Thanks for your post.
Reply With Quote