| Re: Godel makes 2 deceitful moves in his imcompleteness theorem proof
This thread is a perfect example of why we need a forum done in layman`s terms...I had to research way too much of this to fully aprecciate it.
But it does not appear as though Godel was trying to decieve as much as explain something that he did not have all the proper theorim for.
If he had access to the same technology and books we do today, then you`d probably be referencing him instead of this Dean person of whom I have never heard of, nor has the physics professor who is standing over my shoulder.
|