View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2008, 08:52 AM
Billy Billy is offline
Full Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA, Earth
Posts: 93
Thanks: 17
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 2
Billy is on a distinguished road
Becoming research versus Being research? Philosophical positions in science?

I'm entering new territory for me, hoping someone has an answer or lead for me. Links would be great, even if you have something which VAGUELY relates to this question. Feel free to skip to my question, which is #3 at the bottom. Greek words are underlined.

1. If the duration of now depends on how we conceive of the passage of time, then Becoming philosophers Heraclitus, William James and Henri Bergson experience a duration of now different from Being philosophers Plotinus, Parmenides, and disciples of the Eleatic School.

2. Science is dominated by a Becoming perspective, with its emphasis on chronos as its time–objective time. Correlational study, Prospective study, Retrospective study, Longitudinal study, all relate to events occurring within a Becoming or chronos flow of time. Laboratory and field experiments commonly examine the impact of an event or intervention on some outcome, and thus also operate within a Becoming perspective. Daniel N. Stern (in The Present Moment, 2004) is an advocate of the Being perspective and kairos–subjective time. Stern points out that “contemporary psychology has been comfortable with chronos as its time concept and use it productively. For instance, if one is interested in notions of before and after, the estimation of time intervals, the temporal limits of perceiving simultaneity or continuity, most studies of memory, or even how narratives and the real world is constructed in the mind, there is no need for a present moment that is any thicker than a point, no need for subjective units of time, and certainly no need for present moments that unfold with characteristic time contours.” (p. 137).

Stern’s mother-infant dyad research, in contrast, required a thicker present moment, a present moment that unfolds with uncharacteristic time contours.

3. My question is: Does anyone have a definition of (or further information about) Becoming research versus Being research? Any information about these philosophical perspectives as they relate to Science and research? Want to discuss it?

Thanks!

Billy
Reply With Quote
The following users say: THANK YOU - Billy for the above post!