View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2008, 04:42 AM
Didymos Thomas's Avatar
Didymos Thomas Didymos Thomas is offline
Moderator
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2,399
Thanks: 525
Thanked 457 Times in 372 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Rep Power: 8
Didymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of lightDidymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of lightDidymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of lightDidymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of lightDidymos Thomas is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Even so, I don't really count Socrates as a great philosopher. He was foundational, of course, but he wasn't like Plato or Aristotle, who came up with massive, comprehensive philosophical systems that touched almost every relevant area of philosophical thought. Those two were greats.
I guess this depends on our conception of the ideal philosopher. "To organize is to destroy", and, as you point out, Plato and Aristotle came up with massive philosophical systems.

Quote:
Hume should absolutely be on there; I'd take him over Locke or Berkely if I had to choose only one Empiricist.
Absolutely. I mentioned Locke because the list had Rosseau, and I think that Locke's political thought was more influential than Rosseaus and that Locke stands prominently as a philosopher even without his political reputation.

Quote:
I have a hard time putting any type of Scholastic philosopher, including Aquinas, on a list of greats. Aquinas was a great Christian theologian, but not a great philosopher.
Peter Abelard might be a worthy name to add, if only because he signaled the beginning of the end of scholasticism.
Reply With Quote