Quote:
Something I've been asking myself for some time is the following:
If a person commits a good action with bad motive, is that action good or bad?
Or the opposit, is a bad action with a good motive bad?
Ofcourse I'm talking about morally good/bad, right/wrong etc.
|
I think you have to ask 'good for who'? If a person does something good for someone else, but the agent's motivation was for ill, then the action was good for the other person and harmful to the agent.
Quote:
Scenario A
Person A owns a small grandma/granpa style bakery, when his business one day lack some cash he borrows it from the local gangster Person B. Person B helps the loan shop out and lend him the money for a normal fee, the same he would have been given at any bank for lending their money. The bakery is soon up and running once again, going great. When Person A dies, he have yet to give the money back to Person B who knew that if he didn't collect the debt, it would grow to the point that he could take the bakery from the now dead Person A, so that his children gets nothing.
Was the action of lending the money good or bad?
|
The gangster was lending with interest. What the gangster did was not entirely morally acceptable. Though, we might say that it is good the owners of the bakery keep their shop, assuming, of course, the gangster does not take it from them.
Quote:
Scenario B
Person A is a crime boss, on the orders of him his crew robs and beat up the locals in an area of the city. A person from this area Person B, tries to talk some sence into him but without results, the cops are helpless and won't do anything. When Person A orders the hit of a local shop owner Person B takes action. He gets a gun and shoots Person A.
Was the action of killing the ruthless crime boss good or bad?
|
I get the feeling you can answer these as well as I can. That Person A no longer terrorizes the city is good, but taking a life is not good.
Quote:
My point of view:
I think the whole good/bad thing is blurry.. According to the law it's close to only the action who decides the punishment, the motive is not as importat..
I can't honestly say if i think a good action with bad motive is good or bad, while at the same time I can't really say if a bad action with a good motive is good or bad.. But of the two, I think the later is better then the first..
|
Good and bad are defined in terms of each other - without "bad" there is no "good". And good and bad in any given situation is different. We might highlight certain things which are usually harmful - bad intent, killing, that sort of thing. But good and bad is circumstantial.